Johansson et al. (2024) 24/25
LUMAT Vol 12 No 3 (2024), 10. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.12.3.2455
References
Aharony, N. (2015). Factors affecting the adoption of e-books by information professionals. Journal of
Librarianship and Information Science, 47(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000614532120
Andrée, M. (2007). Den levda läroplanen [The Lived Curriculum] [Doctoral dissertation]. Stockholm university.
Brueck, J. S., & Lenhart, L. A. (2015). E‐Books and TPACK: What teachers need to know. The Reading Teacher,
68(5), 373–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1323
Cayton-Hodges, G. A., Feng, G., & Pan, X. (2015). Tablet-based math assessment: What can we learn from math
apps? Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 3–20.
Chiu, T. K. F., Ismailov, M., Zhou, X., Xia, Q., Au, C. K., & Chai, C. S. (2023). Using Self-Determination Theory to
explain how community-based learning fosters student interest and identity in integrated STEM education.
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(S1), 109–130.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10382-x
Dyrvold, A. (2022). Missed opportunities in digital teaching platforms: Under-use of interactive and dynamic
elements. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 41(2), 135–161.
Dyrvold, A., & Bergvall, I. (2023). Static, dynamic and interactive elements in digital teaching materials in
mathematics: How do they foster interaction, exploration and persistence? LUMAT: International Journal on
Math, Science and Technology Education, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.11.3.1941
Education Committee & [Utbildningsutskottet]. (2016). Digitaliseringen i skolan: Dess påverkan på kvalitet,
likvärdighet och resultat i utbildningen [Digitalisation in school: Its impact on quality, equality and results in
education] (No. 2015/16:RFR18). https://data.riksdagen.se/fil/24B42258-6038-470F-80C6-F5CE149F401B
Embong, A. M., Noor, A. M., Hashim, H. M., Ali, R. M., & Shaari, Z. H. (2012). E-Books as textbooks in the
classroom. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1802–1809.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.903
Fan, L., Zhu, Y., & Miao, Z. (2013). Textbook research in mathematics education: Development status and
directions. ZDM, 45(5), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0539-x
Friese, S. (2013). ATLAS ti 7 user guide and reference. Atlas ti Scientific Software Development GmbH.
Grönlund, Å., Wiklund, M., & Böö, R. (2018). No name, no game: Challenges to use of collaborative digital
textbooks. Education and Information Technologies, 23(3), 1359–1375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-
9669-z
Harrison, T. R., & Lee, H. S. (2018). iPads in the mathematics classroom: developing criteria for selecting
appropriate learning apps. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 6(2),
155–172. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.408939
Hoyles, C. (2018). Transforming the mathematical practices of learners and teachers through digital technology.
Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2018.1484799
Hutchison, A. (2012). Literacy teachers’ perceptions of professional development that increases integration of
technology into literacy instruction. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 21(1), 37–56.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2012.659894
Jazby, D., Widjaja, W., Xu, L., & Van Driel, J. H. (2023). Noticing student thinking under pressure in primary
mathematics and science lessons. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(2), 645–
666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10263-9
Johansson, H., & Österholm, M. (2023). Algebra discourses in mathematics and physics textbooks: Comparing the
use of algebraic symbols. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1–22.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2023.2226154
Kaya, E., & Erduran, S. (2024). Comparison of physics, chemistry, and biology teachers’ perceptions of nature of
science and domains of science. Science & Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00576-2
Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in
Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
Larkin, K., & Lowrie, T. (2023). Teaching approaches for STEM Integration in pre- and primary school: a
systematic qualitative literature review. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(S1),
11–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10362-1
Läromedelsförlagen. (2020). Sverige satsar minst pengar på läromedel i Norden. [Sweden invests the least
amount of money in teaching materials in the Nordic countries].
Credit to the Original Article | Explore More of Their Work If You Found This Article Enjoyable.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387244609_Teachers’_use_of_digital_textbooks_in_mathematics_and_science_education
