Johansson et al. (2024) 24/25

LUMAT Vol 12 No 3 (2024), 10. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.12.3.2455

References

Aharony, N. (2015). Factors affecting the adoption of e-books by information professionals. Journal of

Librarianship and Information Science, 47(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000614532120

Andrée, M. (2007). Den levda läroplanen [The Lived Curriculum] [Doctoral dissertation]. Stockholm university.

Brueck, J. S., & Lenhart, L. A. (2015). E‐Books and TPACK: What teachers need to know. The Reading Teacher,

68(5), 373–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1323

Cayton-Hodges, G. A., Feng, G., & Pan, X. (2015). Tablet-based math assessment: What can we learn from math

apps? Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 3–20.

Chiu, T. K. F., Ismailov, M., Zhou, X., Xia, Q., Au, C. K., & Chai, C. S. (2023). Using Self-Determination Theory to

explain how community-based learning fosters student interest and identity in integrated STEM education.

International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(S1), 109–130.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10382-x

Dyrvold, A. (2022). Missed opportunities in digital teaching platforms: Under-use of interactive and dynamic

elements. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 41(2), 135–161.

Dyrvold, A., & Bergvall, I. (2023). Static, dynamic and interactive elements in digital teaching materials in

mathematics: How do they foster interaction, exploration and persistence? LUMAT: International Journal on

Math, Science and Technology Education, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.11.3.1941

Education Committee & [Utbildningsutskottet]. (2016). Digitaliseringen i skolan: Dess påverkan på kvalitet,

likvärdighet och resultat i utbildningen [Digitalisation in school: Its impact on quality, equality and results in

education] (No. 2015/16:RFR18). https://data.riksdagen.se/fil/24B42258-6038-470F-80C6-F5CE149F401B

Embong, A. M., Noor, A. M., Hashim, H. M., Ali, R. M., & Shaari, Z. H. (2012). E-Books as textbooks in the

classroom. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1802–1809.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.903

Fan, L., Zhu, Y., & Miao, Z. (2013). Textbook research in mathematics education: Development status and

directions. ZDM, 45(5), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0539-x

Friese, S. (2013). ATLAS ti 7 user guide and reference. Atlas ti Scientific Software Development GmbH.

Grönlund, Å., Wiklund, M., & Böö, R. (2018). No name, no game: Challenges to use of collaborative digital

textbooks. Education and Information Technologies, 23(3), 1359–1375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-

9669-z

Harrison, T. R., & Lee, H. S. (2018). iPads in the mathematics classroom: developing criteria for selecting

appropriate learning apps. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 6(2),

155–172. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.408939

Hoyles, C. (2018). Transforming the mathematical practices of learners and teachers through digital technology.

Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2018.1484799

Hutchison, A. (2012). Literacy teachers’ perceptions of professional development that increases integration of

technology into literacy instruction. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 21(1), 37–56.

https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2012.659894

Jazby, D., Widjaja, W., Xu, L., & Van Driel, J. H. (2023). Noticing student thinking under pressure in primary

mathematics and science lessons. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(2), 645–

666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10263-9

Johansson, H., & Österholm, M. (2023). Algebra discourses in mathematics and physics textbooks: Comparing the

use of algebraic symbols. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1–22.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2023.2226154

Kaya, E., & Erduran, S. (2024). Comparison of physics, chemistry, and biology teachers’ perceptions of nature of

science and domains of science. Science & Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00576-2

Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in

Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.

Larkin, K., & Lowrie, T. (2023). Teaching approaches for STEM Integration in pre- and primary school: a

systematic qualitative literature review. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(S1),

11–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10362-1

Läromedelsförlagen. (2020). Sverige satsar minst pengar på läromedel i Norden. [Sweden invests the least

amount of money in teaching materials in the Nordic countries].

Pressrum

Credit to the Original Article | Explore More of Their Work If You Found This Article Enjoyable.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387244609_Teachers’_use_of_digital_textbooks_in_mathematics_and_science_education